Platform tools for OAI harvesting

So, in recent OLAC presentation I talked about enabling Omeka or Drupal via recipes for OAI harvesting. Here is some links to internet chatter on these issues.

Koha

enable Items in KOHA OAI Harvesting

https://koha-community.org/manual/18.05/en/html/webservices.html

https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/38956/export-of-zotero-citation-to-marc-format-for-import-into-koha-lms

wordpress

Day 13: Harvest data with OAI-PMH

WordPress and Drupal

https://acrl.ala.org/techconnect/post/creating-an-oai-pmh-feed-from-your-website/

eHive

https://developers.ehive.com/

Catmandu

https://librecatproject.wordpress.com/tutorial/

Omeka
https://omeka.org/classic/docs/Plugins/OaiPmhRepository/

MOAI
https://pypi.org/project/MOAI/

PyOAI
https://pypi.org/project/pyoai/

Is HTML5 a subset of SGML?

One of the lectures in my courses had me asking the following question: Is HTML5 a subset of SGML?

I did a little googling. Here are the links I found most relevant. Maybe someday I will write my own opinion on the topic... The short answer is that HTML5 became an abstract language with two modes of instantiation. One is XML valid (and hence SGML), the other is not SGML valid.

  • https://www.w3.org/2008/Talks/04-24-smith/index.html
  • https://mathiasbynens.be/notes/xhtml5
  • https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#html-vs-xhtml
  • https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5558502/is-html5-valid-xml/39560454#39560454
  • https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8460993/p-end-tag-p-is-not-needed-in-html
  • https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1946426/html-5-is-it-br-br-or-br
  • https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5558502/is-html5-valid-xml

Woodworking Links

I have a bit of a woodworking business.

here are some links I've been collecting. I have been looking for a brand.

https://brandingirons.com/collections/wood/products/multi-use

https://www.rockler.com/custom-branding-iron-16-styles-available

https://www.rockler.com/hand-tools/wood-burning/wood-branding-irons

https://www.theverge.com/23013610/etsy-crafts-sell-creative-amazon-shopify-how-to

Long Cheese Slicer Assembly Kit

http://www.csgnetwork.com/bizstartupcalc.html

Afternoon snack

Katja and I had afternoon hot chocolate today. we talked about her work at school. She is learning about typography and letter height. Worm line, grass line, airplane line and cloud line. I showed her some of my work and some of the font things I’ve done and the font book we have here in the house.

Font lines and homework lines
Stirring milk for hot choclate

MARC Records for Journal Articles

I am looking for some examples of MARC records for journal articles, and for chapters of books. I see lots of MARC records for ISSN (whole journals). I am also looking for MARC records for proceedings or edited volumes but I am not finding journal article, chapters of edited volumes, or proceedings papers/chapters. I'm looking for the kinds of fields they use (fingerprints of the data structure). I see that this has been an acknowledged issue via MARC Discussion Paper 2003-DP01. https://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2003/2003-dp01.html That discussion paper points to MARC fields which are documented here. I also see that OCLC has a page that talks about these issues in section 3.2: https://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/specialcataloging.html

I also realize that these are resource types which are generally not cataloged at the library level, and hence the research question... I'm looking for ways that MARC can be used as a data storage format for these resources.

There have been questions about this for at least 10 years.

Gender Identity Terms in LCSH

I have two categorical questions as I am working through LCSH related work part of my cataloging course in my MS-LS degree.

In the case of Gender Identity and sexual orientation based terms, there seems to be an over specification on some terms and an underspecification on contrastive terms. I would like to know if I am reading the assumptions correctly.

For example: There is a LCSH term for Flight Attendants. However, there is also a term for Gay Flight Attendants. Linguistically, this split (marked and unmarked) seems fairly common. So my questions are:

1. Am I to understand that the LCSH term "Flight Attendants" excludes "Gay Flight Attendants", or am I to assume that Flight Attendants is a super-ordinant category one sub-class of which is Gay Flight Attendants (with potentially hundreds other sub-classes left unnamed)?

2. Why were terms related to gender identity and sexual orientation not established as free-floating "modifier terms"? It seems that to be overt about gender identity and sexual orientation in a term one should have "Straight Flight Attendants" to contrast with "Gay Flight Attendants", but the gender identity and sexual orientation literature suggests that this is not a two way distinction so where are all the other terms? Are there minimum requirements for the addition of new terms (15 works or something like that, but then how does one go back and re-classify materials like this)? It seems from an entity management perspective that making Gender Identity terms free-floating allows for the fewest number of entities with the greatest amount of descriptive power. The gender identity and sexual orientation modification pattern applies equally well to the religious identity terms. Consider: "Muslim Flight Attendants".

With regard to #2 above is this the difference between a noun-noun construction and a adjective-noun construction?

A couple of Academic Papers on the subject:

https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=kT4THMkDbE8C&oi=fnd&pg=PA212&dq=gender+identity+Library+of+congress+subject+heading&ots=KASutPRf-9&sig=m6D4lnIUR7-sh8b9XKPKst1uTyo#v=onepage&q=gender%20identity%20Library%20of%20congress%20subject%20heading&f=false

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19322900903341099
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/706989/summary
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J104v43n01_03
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1682848331?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/102490
https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2012-5-370.pdf