Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

The Journeyler

A walk through: Life, Leadership, Linguistics, Language Documentation, WordPress, and OS X (and a bit of Marketing & Business Administration)

The Journeyler

Main menu

  • Home
  • CV/Resume
  • Family
    • Katja
    • Hugh V
  • Location
    • Cartography
    • Geo-Tagging
    • GPS
  • Language Documentation
    • Linguistics
    • Digital Archival
  • Visiting Collections
    • Photography
    • Open Drafts
    • Posts to move to another website
  • Archives

Daily Archives: May 17, 2023

Of-ness in audio recordings

Posted on May 17, 2023 by Hugh Paterson III
Reply

Subject analysis is very interesting. In a recent investigation into a theory of subject analysis, I was introduced to the concepts of: "about-ness", "is-ness", "of-ness".

Sometimes I wonder if linguists defy standard practices in subject representation, of if they define what a general population holds as a challenge with subject analysis in cataloging.

I harken to the OLAC application profile, which is based on Dublin Core. Dublin Core does not scope the subject element to "about-ness" analysis. UNT curriculum, informed and based (in structure) on Steven J. Miller', Metadata for Digital Collections: A How-To-Do-It Manual. The issue at hand is that for linguists, about-ness is only relevant for Information resources representing analysis. For other kinds of resources such as primary oral texts, or narratives captured via video which are often the object analyzed and discussed in information resources representing analysis, the primary view on subjecthood is through of-ness. As far as I know no-one has discussed audio and of-ness descriptions of audio.

It also makes me wonder if genre is mostly about utility and not about a binding style. To this end then a scholar looking for a phonology corpus, is looking for what—a combination of things—a MIMEType, with a relationship to another MIMEType, with an of-ness of a kind and a subject of "phonology".

By splitting up the concepts of: "about-ness", "is-ness", and "of-ness" it provides analytical space for more articulate descriptions in the dc:description field. But when it comes to language materials, the question is: is language a subject by virtue of "of-ness" or by virtue of "about-ness"? There are several implications here:

  1. The description field ought to be re-thought.
  2. The subject field ought to be re-thought.
  3. Some searches by linguists are likely the concatenation of two or three factors: A relationship between two records, and a subject of a kind and a subject of a different kind.
Posted in Other Journals | Tagged about-ness, audio recordings, Description, Dublin core, metadata, of-ness, OLAC, Subject, UNT-notes | Leave a reply

Activity

May 2023
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Apr   Jun »

I’ve been saying

  • Forever changed
  • Thanksgiving eve in Yachats
  • DCMIType PhysicalObject
  • Some resources on Names and Name diversity
  • Chocolate granola
  • RadWagon4
  • OLAC CVs
  • NLP Interchange Format
  • Curriculum Creation and Blooms Taxonomies
  • Train through Austria
  • Happy birthday
  • Another Use of Language Codes

Say What?

  • Hugh Paterson III on Tradition & Deer Trails
  • Hugh Paterson III on Staying fit
  • Jedidiah Paterson on Staying fit
  • Jedidiah Paterson on Tradition & Deer Trails
  • kristina Oma Cartwright on Seton Sands Holiday Park

One should not consider the content on this website to be an official opinion of any company associated with me. These posts are solely my opinion.

Proudly powered by WordPress
 

Loading Comments...