This application profile is interesting because the use Additive DC:Type values to refine each other... http://lib.psnc.pl/Content/153/CIMI%20-%20DC%20Guide%20to%20Best%20Practice.pdf
Tag Archives: Dublin core
Dublin Core Uses
There are several Dublin Core Uses... but what are the models behind them? Are they the same? Are they different? If they are different then does this mean that Dublin Core is more like a brand name than a metadata standard?
RSS: https://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/modules/dcterms/
HTML: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcq-html/; https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dc-html/
HTML: https://www.hjp.at/doc/rfc/rfc2731.html ; https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2731.txt
Note that in https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2731.txt they use DC1.0
When another application profile "borrows" the DC property/term/element... how do they borrow it? https://exiv2.org/tags-xmp-dwc.html
HTML Metadata tags and Dublin Core
https://infosci.um.ac.ir/index.php/RRP/article_27183.html?lang=en
https://doi.org/10.1080/13614579709516904
https://archive.ifla.org/documents/libraries/cataloging/metadata/drusch.pdf
http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/10/dublin/
https://www.sid.ir/paper/102563/en
https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/18374/20723
https://mn.gov/bridges/user2study.pdf
http://eprints.rclis.org/7319/
http://eprints.rclis.org/7319/1/Search_Engines_and_Resource_Discovery.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504045851
https://www.seroundtable.com/google-on-using-dublin-core-schema-29002.html
https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/data/UQ_7837/final.html
https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:7837 <-- What is it with repositories and asking for human verification? Isn't the point of these to be machine crawlable...? Same thing with SIL
https://www.seroundtable.com/google-on-using-dublin-core-schema-29002.html
Subjects around DC: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/520975/pdf
Abstract and Table of Contents
If abstract is a sample of about-ness, then a table of contents is sample if is-ness. Some have said that journal articles should not have table of contents (instructional staff at the UNT program teaching the Metadata I course). I disagree, but so does Habing, et al (2001). Sometimes more than an abstract a table of contents can deliver a substantial understanding of what an article is and is about by displaying its structure. In fact many law review articles actually include a table of contents prior to the main part of the article. Law review articles can be over 70 pages in length. An outline offers useful information to the potential reader.
An example of an outline from a linguistics article.
Roberts, David. 2011. “A Tone Orthography Typology.” Written Language & Literacy 14 (1): 82–108. doi:10.1075/wll.14.1.05rob.
- Introduction
- The six parameters
2.1 First parameter: Domain
2.2 Second parameter: Target
2.2.1 Tones
2.2.2 Grammar
2.2.3 Lexicon
2.2.4 Dual strategies
2.3 Third parameter: Symbol
2.3.1 Phonographic representations
2.3.2 Semiographic representations
2.4 Fourth parameter: Position
2.5 Fifth parameter: Density
2.5.1 Introduction
2.5.2 Zero density
2.5.3 Partial density
2.5.4 Exhaustive density
2.6 Sixth parameter: Depth
2.6.1 Introduction
2.6.2 Surface representation
2.6.3 Deep representation
2.6.4 Shallow (transparent) representation - Conclusion
Abbreviations
Notes
Bibliographical references
References
Thomas G. Habing, Timothy W. Cole, and William H. Mischo. 2001. Qualified Dublin Core using RDF for Sci-Tech Journal Articles. https://dli.grainger.uiuc.edu/Publications/metadatacasestudy/HabingDC2001.pdf
Dublin Core Subject field
Dublin Core has a subject element. But what constitutes a subject?
Two points on this:
- Subject-hood is a complex notion. As pointed out by Birger Hjørland included in this concept can be both is-ness and about-ness. LIS theory can say to divide these concepts, but if Dublin Core as a descriptive framework does not allow this, then the notion of subjecthood should be assumed to include both notions.
- Pictures (still images, including paintings) are complex when evaluating their subject hood. First, when a picture depicts something then it is reasonable to say that the picture is about that thing, as well as the picture is something...
I am suggesting that Dublin Core as a standard does not distinguish between about-ness and is-ness with regard to subject. And to further make matters complicated about-ness and is-ness merge more in visual media than in other types of print based media.
The following articles indirectly address the distinction of about-ness and is-ness or address about-ness in visual media.
Rushton, M. Public Funding of Controversial Art. Journal of Cultural Economics 24, 267–282 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007682121108
Wall, J. M. (2005). The Medium & the Message: Theology and Film. Theology Today, 62(1), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/004057360506200109
Wanda Klenczon & Paweł Rygiel (2014) Librarian Cornered by Images, or How to Index Visual Resources, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52:1, 42-61, DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2013.848123
in a book
Emerging Frameworks and Methods: CoLIS 4 : Proceedings of the Fourth
Andrea Witcomb (1997) On the Side of the Object: an Alternative Approach to Debates About Ideas, Objects and Museums, Museum Management and Curatorship, 16:4, 383-399, DOI: 10.1080/09647779700501604
Wang, X., Song, N., Liu, X. and Xu, L. (2021), "Data modeling and evaluation of deep semantic annotation for cultural heritage images", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 77 No. 4, pp. 906-925. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2020-0102
Dublin Core in HTML pages
Dublin Core is sometimes inserted into in the HTML header for search engine optimization purposes. I am very curious to know which search engine are being optimized for with the inclusion of DC metadata in the HTML header. Google clearly sates they don't use keywords anymore. Some argue that dublin core tags are different than keywords and therefore google might still be using them. As far as I know the specifics are a trade secret that Google hasn't made public. If anyone knows more on this please let me know in the comments.
I do know that Google's search engine scholar.google.com runs via a different bot and crawl process and does use some DC tags for identification. They have a sub-dialect of tags and have added some non-standard (not true dublin core) tags to what they expect. — how rude and presumptuous of Google... But Google Scholar is the only search engine I know about looking for Dublin Core metadata in HTML. If anyone knows of another one I'm very keen to know about it.
Bing sunset their academic/scholar service. My understanding is that when it was running, it was just one bot that crawled the data and then they filtered the single crawl to create the academic materials product this is a different approach than Google is taking.
Here are some interesting links on Dublin Core in the headers:
http://webposible.com/utilidades/dublincore-metadata-gen/index.php?lang=en
http://criticism.com/seo/dublin-core-metadata.php
https://www.problogbooster.com/2010/12/use-dublin-core-meta-tags-in-blog-to.html
https://www.problogbooster.com/2010/03/meta-tag-generator-online-free-url-keyword-seo-html-description-code-improve-pagerank-traffic.html
https://www.woorank.com/en/blog/dublin-core-metadata-for-seo-and-usability
https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dc-html/
Audio CMS for archives
I must say this open source solution looks amazing and I need to try it out!
http://telemeta.org/category/projects.html