https://github.com/johnfraney/django-ner-trainer
https://johnfraney.github.io/django-ner-trainer/
https://github.com/doccano/doccano
https://prodi.gy/buy
https://github.com/GitTeaching/Django_NER_Crisis?tab=readme-ov-file
https://github.com/johnfraney/django-ner-trainer
https://johnfraney.github.io/django-ner-trainer/
https://github.com/doccano/doccano
https://prodi.gy/buy
https://github.com/GitTeaching/Django_NER_Crisis?tab=readme-ov-file
I have been reflecting on how our environment is shaped by algorithms. We are presented options via algorithms (in cases like direct marketing). We are sometimes subject to the impacts of automation systems such as systems in California which assign the possibility of bail based an algorithmic assessment of the case file.
In an AI based culture we can’t control the AI based nature of those things reported around us(variable prices or news articles), but we can focus our relationships on those around us. The question of social importance is where does the AI influence us in the decision making process? The problem in legal frameworks are that the decision processes are directed graphs with bounded options. However we are not bounded in our decision making as individuals. That is, AI may not actually be more equitable or just than a human decision maker.
In a sense then to reduce decisions to AI decision makers is to show a certain amount of apathy.
© 2005-2024 Hugh Paterson III All Rights Reserved.
By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your Words, Name & Website URL in attribution.
Details of your viewing experience maybe retained and used. -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright